Your session is going to timeout resulting from inactivity. Click on Alright to increase your time and effort for yet another 0 minutes.
I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was acquiring much more tension and was slower in comparison to the previous things. I don't keep in mind if I even attempted regular h4831 or not; I am considering not. Simply click to increase...
You happen to be proper They may be a similar the SC is brief Minimize so it meters far better, I don't think you can find just typical 4831 any longer
That means the knowledgable handloader can, with some extrapolation, locate a setting up load when just one is outlined for a specific cartridge.
INgunner54 claimed: It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Observed a node and shot some teams.
I know, rough instances. H4831SC will definitely perform, I just didn't like the case density when loaded long. I do not try to remember powder demand off the highest of my head but I used to be launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps that's in which I usually intention to be. As part of your situation employing what you might have (and what I should have done) I'd personally start with the end of the bearing surface with the bullet correct with the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you finally find a velocity node.
I do not like to work up a load utilizing 1 large amount of powder and after that have to work up once more since I run out and possess to start out utilizing a new great deal quantity.
excaliber reported: I've discovered the precise opposite to generally be genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally exact powder in my 300 Win Mag.
I could stack em in one hole but I wasn’t content with the velocity. Immediately after months, I obtained Fortunate and caught some H1000 on-line not to mention compensated somewhat more. The quite up coming 7 days in a gun display a man had a whole scenario of H1000 for $40 for every 1lb. I fail to remember simply how much, but Using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a moderate load.
Additionally, it goes on to claim that due to the fshorter grains, that load density could h4831 vs h4831sc be slightly better.
I required somewhat far more myself so I went forward and grabbed the 8lb jug to get protected for quite a while (and possess loads of the same lot of powder).
Immediately after looking at this text (and plenty of Other individuals, but this 1 is the most data pushed with a number of accredited shooters) I've stopped stressing about touching or currently being inside a magical length through the lands, and started loading where I could enhance several facets of a load. Just my .02, hopefully you can h4831 vs h4831sc find anything to work for ya.
Am i able to assume that H4831 might be substituted for H4831sc ? I'm sure the physical variation but will it have an affect on the burn up or h4831sc velocity? I believe not but I am not a hundred% sure.
This looks like a good location to disclose a bit more details on Hodgdon, H4831 particularly...I the moment had a pound of H4831SC sit about the shelf for a number of several years. It absolutely was bought in advance of Hodgdon commenced publicizing the "Severe" line of powders, of which the H4831s are an element.